Triangle Report
Annual status update
District: Syangja
Period covered by this report: January to December 2013, monitored in March 2014
Name of village |
JOGITHUM CHHAPA – Water Village, NP-2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Was the Triangle procedure followed? Were there any deviations from the standard procedure? |
Yes the villagers followed the Triangle procedure. There were not any deviations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How many people were present at the village meeting? |
29 men/20 women and there were 9 from Dalits for Settlement Level Planning, SLP |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How many members are in the committee? |
5 men, 4 women
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What were the issues raised at the village meeting? |
Community health post, drinking water, foot trail, income generation activities, scholarship for poor children, women empowerment, health and sanitation, education for children, environment sanitation, women skill development (sewing and cutting), drinking water, enterprise development, irrigation |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What were the priorities presented by the committee? |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What did the villagers decide to spend the Triangle funds on? |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Has the committee received the funds yet? |
Yes in October 2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Activity plan: When are the activities going to be implemented? |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Who is responsible for the implementation? |
The village committee plays the vital role to implement all activities and after that, VDC Secretary and Triangle responsible person Hari supported the implementing and and monitoring. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How were the beneficiaries selected? |
After completing the settlement level planning the village committees’ member again organized the meeting and made the criteria to distribution of money. Generally the villager made some indicators for the distribution of money The family with no or very little land, poor house condition, lack of food for whole year, Labors for others for livelihood, unemployed family, no guarantee for income etc. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Were there any disagreements – discussions about the priorities? What was the role of the Triangle facilitator? |
The villager’s perception was that the Triangle support was very low. After the settlement level planning training and exercise and facilitation from ASK that the money is for supporting system. Now villagers understood in the right way. ASK cooperates and fully focused on the settlement level planning (SLP) process and explain that the SLP is done through training from Triangle, which also included the engagement of communities to plan and apply for projects from the Village Development Committee. The villagers saw that the Triangle in partnership with ASK is supporting planning, implementation, monitoring, coordination and reporting. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did the villagers have any comments/questions for the Triangle? |
Due to lack of awareness it was difficult to manage the money in the right way in previous year and because of some conflict of interest. But after villagers participated in SLP they developed trust and realized, fully agreed, and called it a realistic and participatory way of planning for the village. However, Triangle/ASK has to provide more technical support for the SLP. |
On-going activities – Status Update
Name of village/cluster |
Last visit: |
Progress in the reporting period |
Changes/delays/comments |
(Jogithum Chhapa-NP 2 Named: Water Village) |
October 2013 |
1. Settlement level planning was completed. 2. All planned activities from Trianglen Support; Chhapa foot trail improvement and upgrading, social harmony training, construction of Jogithum foot trail, income generating activities such as goat rising and small poultry for women, bee keeping training are in under Implementation |
|
(Jogithum Chhapa-NP 2 Named: Water Village) |
Jan. 2014 |
All planned activities except Social awareness training were completed |
|
Reporting of Micro loan
Use of Microloan until 2013 |
Micro loan total collected from pay back of loans: Nrs 178000 (Nrs 67,000 from 2011+ Nrs 60,000 from 2012 + Nrs 51,000 from 2013)
|
outcome from Previous Year (year 2012) |
Achievement of 2012 from Micro loan so far:
|
Some glimpse of the village where they spent money
Repairing of foot trail in Chhapa village | Income generation through pig raising with women/Motimaya successfully well done |
A small poultry farm | People preparing coop for the poultry farming |
Bee hive with bees with Chitra bahadur gurung |