Triangle Annual Report from Village
Annual status update
District: Syangja
Period covered by this report: January to December 2014 with follow up after earthquake in May 2015
Name of village | Reepa, NP-10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Was the Triangle procedure followed? Were there any deviations from the standard procedure? | Yes, the villagers followed the triangle procedure and held settlement level planning in September. There were not any deviations. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How many people were present at the village meeting? | 20 men/20 women in Settlement Level Planning- SLP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How many members are in the committee? |
5 men, 4 women and 2 Dalits
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What were the issues raised at the village meeting? | Water and sanitation, repairing of school furniture, income generation activities, women empowerment, youth empowerment, irrigation, ponds conservation, school repairing, foot road, women Skill development, vegetables farming, road etc. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What were the priorities presented by the committee? |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What did the villagers decide to spend the funds on? | The villagers decide to spend Nrs 20,000.00 for community building construction, Nrs 10,000.00 for Sumre drinking water stream conservation, Nrs 15,000.00 for vegetables farming, Nrs 10,000.00 for stools making from bamboo, Nrs 8,000.00 for youth club for repairing volleyball ground, Nrs 10,000 for poultry support and Nrs 15,000.00 for goat raising from Triangle supported Money. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Has the committee received the funds yet? | Yes in October 2014, it was transferred. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Activity plan: When are the activities going to be implemented? | All planned activities were completed, which are described below:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Who is responsible for the implementation? | The village committee plays the vital role to implement all activities and after that VDC Secretary, VDC social Mobilizer and Triangle responsible person Hari also support to implement and monitor. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How were the beneficiaries selected? |
After completed the settlement level planning the village committees’ members again organized the meeting and make the criteria to distribution of money. Generally the villager followed some indicators for the distribution of money which is indicated by LGCDP (Local Government Community Development Programme):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Were there any disagreements – discussions about the priorities? What was the role of the Triangle facilitator? |
Some of the villagers found that the Triangle donation could not fulfil all aspects of the wishes the villages had. However, the facilitator and Hari explained about the money and the supporting system from Triangle (getting to know how to influence VDC and DDC to get projects approved, and how to ask for better services). Specially ASK cooperate and fully focus on the settlement level planning process with the engagement of communities, give the information of the Triangle, and about the resources of the VDC block grant and the District Development Office possibilities of supporting the village. The villages have seen that the Triangle support to ASK and the villages, has given the villagers more tools for managing their own resources and influencing those of the local bodies (VDC and DDC). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did the villagers have any comments/questions for the Triangle? | With lack of awareness, it was difficult to manage the money the right way the previous year, but after villagers participated in settlement level planning, they realized and fully agreed to the method and found it was realistic and participatory. There was a request that ASK should provide more technical knowledge for the settlement level planning and development possibilities in the village. Now the money for micro-loan is increasing so it has to provide the account management knowledge also. |
On-going activities – Status Update
Name of village/cluster | Last visit: | Progress in the reporting period | Changes/delays/comments |
Reepa NP-10 Named: Orange Village |
September 2014 |
1. Settlement level planning is completed. 2. All planned activities are under Implementation |
|
Reepa NP-10 Named: Orange Village | May 2015 | All planned activities were completed | There are no any comments and changes. |
Reporting of Micro loan
Use of Microloan until end 2014 | Micro loan total collected from pay back of loans: Nrs 226000 (188000 from previous year + Nrs 38,000 from 2014)
|
Major Achievements from Previous Year |
|
Impact of Settlement level planning |
|
Some examples of activities supported by Trianglen
Community discussions | Dhan Bahadur Gurung has started a poultry business |
Indra Sunar has started raising pigs | Bamboo stool made by people trained with the support of Trianglen |
Pig raising in the village has increased |
Village situation after earthquake and aftershock
Six houses are totally collapsed and 25 houses are partially cracked. School building and the new community building also partially cracked. Many livestock sheds are cracked and damaged. People are requesting more shelter but the VDC distributed very few so the people are requesting us about the support.
Houses damaged by the earthquake |